Advocates for Beacon Schools
  • About Us
  • USEFUL INFO
  • Events
  • News
  • What Can I Do
  • Contact

Meredith Heuer announces her candidacy for the Board

1/12/2016

3 Comments

 
Picture
photo courtesy of A. McKible

The 1/11/16 Board Meeting was cancelled because a quorum was not present.  According to the NY State School Board Association: “If a quorum is not present, no official business can be conducted until more members arrive. Informal discussion can, however, legally take place, or the meeting can be adjourned (less than a quorum may adjourn).”  Our President, Melissa Thompson, chose to adjourn the meeting.  

Over 350+ parents, teachers, students, and stakeholders remained in the auditorium. Board Members Anthony White and Bill Zopf remained in attendance along with Deputy Superintendent Ann Marie Quartironi.

We thank all of those that stayed and listened to the speakers.  

The following is Meredith Heuer's comment:
​My name is Meredith Heuer and I am the chair of the Beacon Arts & Education 
Foundation.  I began volunteering with this foundation in 2010.  Since then, we have 
sponsored over $80,000 worth of programming in the BCSD.  

Six months ago, I approached this school board with the story of how our foundation 
offered to fund an Arts in Education Coordinator position in the BCSD for the 2014-15 
school year. The primary function of this position would be to maximize the use of the 
New York State BOCES Co-Ser program which, every year, gives back around 50% of 
money spent toward qualifying arts in education programing.  Participation in the 
BOCES Co-Ser plan makes programs like the CALICO BALL (a $16,000/year program) 
possible.  The offer of a donation was refused because, I was told by the superintendent, 
she had found a way to pay a teacher to perform these duties through a grant.  The 
teacher’s title would be: Teacher of Special Assignment, or TOSA now known as and 
Instructional Support Teacher, or IST.  We were thrilled at this news, I passed on all the 
information I and other members of the foundation had gathered over the years to the 
new Coordinator, emails of acknowledgement were sent, and the year passed.  After the 
school year ended, in a meeting to review the Coordinator’s progress in this position, I 
was told by the Superintendent that after her initial announcement to me about the IST 
position she had found that the Coordinator’s responsibilities did not fit in with the rules 
of the grant funding the position and so if this teacher did perform any of these duties, it 
was purely volunteer.  There were only 3 contracts put through the Co-Ser last year and 
the IST was not responsible for any of them.  This is in high contrast to what has 
happened so far this year where there is a new coordinator and there has been a 
tremendous amount of cooperation from teachers, administrators and parents. Nine 
contracts have already been submitted this year.

After I made this statement, I was approached by many members of the community with 
reactions ranging from disappointment to outrage about the lack of communication, the 
possible misuse of funds and the absence of accountability.  From members of the school 
board, there was barely a ripple.  And so I began contacting board members individually 
to ask what they thought about the fact that, even after deciding that the IST position 
could not take on the Coordinator responsibilities, the superintendent chose not to contact me to revisit the idea of the foundation funding the position and the lack of any real accountability for the IST position.  One board member told me that the superintendent had refused our offer for fear that the foundation would not be able to fund it again next year.  Remember, this foundation has raised over $80,000 for this district.  What evidence is there that we are going to disappear? This board member also told me that the superintendent and the IST had had a really hard year.  In a conversation with another board member, I mentioned that I had called the State Education Department to ask about an IST carrying out the duties of an Arts in Education Coordinator and they didn’t see any problem there.  That school board member agreed that it was probably fine.

I wish this was an isolated event.  Instead it seems to be a part of a larger problem of 
systematically shutting down stakeholders who seek to improve the education of our 
children.

Almost a year ago, I was contacted by a middle school music teacher asking for a 
donation to fund an electronic music program that would fulfill the general music 
requirement.  Her reasons for this being a great addition to the curriculum seemed really 
sound to me:  teaching the general music class was challenging because her students had  such varying levels of music knowledge and she had found that, when she was able to 
take them to the computer lab where they worked individually, they could each attain 
success at their own level.

After offering to fund this program, I was met with silence.  After several of my emails 
went unanswered, I wrote the following to the superintendent:  “Over the break I was 
able to reach out to friends who have children in public schools around the country and I 
am finding that my experience of having emails go unanswered (especially when they 
contain an offer of a donation) is very unusual.  When I joined BAEF, it was with the 
understanding that our foundation is in partnership with the district.  As you know, any 
money that we raise is for the BCSD and so it is very confusing to make these offers, and 
ask where we can help, and hear nothing back…. I really believe that any healthy school 
district has an education foundation supporting it. Let's please schedule a meeting where 
we can work out the details of this donation as well as how we can work more smoothly 
together in the future.”

Finally, I was brought in to a meeting where I was told: 1) the program would be better 
launched at the high school because there was already space for it to take place 2) we 
would not need to donate towards it because the superintendent had received a grant to 
fund the program.  I asked if the program would be up and running for the fall and was 
told, “yes.”  Instead, we donated the money to the middle school for desperately needed 
new musical instruments and waited for the program to be launched.  It has not yet 
launched.

Going back even further, in 2012, I began exploring the idea of launching a Youth in 
Government program at the high school. I had heard about this program from many 
adults who had participated in it when they were in high school and had found it life 
changing. We, of course, would fundraise for it so that it would be no cost to the district.  
After 3 years of emailing various administrators in the district I was able to make a 
meeting with a YMCA representative and one of the high school guidance counselors.  
The guidance counselor seemed genuinely moved by the possibilities that this program 
would offer students and by other programming that the Y is willing to bring to us to fill 
some of the gaps we have here.  Students that were freshman when I started this quest are graduating this year. It is heartbreaking to me to think of how many students have missed this opportunity for no good reason.

Anyway, the last board member that I reached out to regarding the IST as arts in ed 
coordinator question made a very strong statement of support for our current 
superintendent but she did say “if you see something, say something” and so here I am to 
say that I have seen something.

We have been told that the board of education ‘just’ makes policy but my recent research 
tells me differently.  In any case, there seem to be some unwritten policies in action here 
that I feel are hindering the progress of our district:  There seems to be a policy of ‘no’, of  
‘we can’t’, of covering for a job not done well or a job not done at all.  After my many 
years of volunteering in this district, I am beginning to realize that things don’t have to be 
this hard.  We are told that this is what we get because we are a focus district, because we are title 1, we don’t deserve better.  I don’t believe this to be true.  I believe that if we can acknowledge this culture of ‘no’ and ‘we can’t’ that has poisoned our district and allowed for abuse of power, we can get back to the original goal here, to support our students and teachers and create an atmosphere where all can thrive.   I have tried, since my children started school to help the district through the channels that the foundation offers but I have decided that it is time to move on.  I would like to announce my candidacy for member of the board of education. It is said that trust is earned in drops and lost in buckets. Let’s start earning that trust back, drop by drop, today with more transparency, accountability and a renewed focus on the children of this district.
3 Comments

Petition calls for Beacon school chief's resignation

1/11/2016

0 Comments

 
The Poughkeepsie Journal reports on a petition filed calling for the Superintendent's resignation and the dismissal of the Board Attorney.  Seeing no other recourse, one parent recently filed a petition with the New York State Department of Education, demanding an investigation, the removal of Dr. Walkley, and the replacement of the BCSD attorney. The petition cites "troubling, unethical, inappropriate and illegal behaviors” by BCSD
leadership, and includes several emails, obtained through a FOIL request, that reveal a culture of contempt and serious conflict of interest between the superintendent and the former BTA President. 

The Poughkeepsie Journal reports:
A parent in the Beacon City School District has filed a petition with the state Education Department, asking for the board to remove the superintendent from her spot.  click here for full article
0 Comments

Wigwam Radio: Let's Talk Beacon Schools

1/7/2016

0 Comments

 
Mark Roland's Wigwam Radio sat  down with Meredith Heuer, chairperson of the Beacon Arts and Education Foundation,  and Lori Merhige to talk Beacon Schools on Thursday, January 7th.  Please follow this link and look forward to the archived show.

In the meantime, please read Meredith Heuer's board comments from the August 31, 2015 Board Meeting.

My name is Meredith Heuer and I have been a part of the Beacon Arts & Education 
Foundation since 2010.  The mission of this foundation is to raise funds through private 
donations and grants to support a more comprehensive education for the students of the 
BCSD.  BAEF has sponsored the Calico Ball for the last 5 years (a $16,000/year 
program) as well as donated funds for field trips, art and music supplies, teaching artist 
workshops, and more.  Last year alone, BAEF’s donation to the schools totaled over 
$25,000 in programming.  

One of BAEF’s biggest successes, in my opinion, was to get the district to renew their 
lapsed contract with the Dutchess County BOCES Co-Ser in 2012.  BOCES stands for 
Board of Cooperative Educational Services. BOCES is a public organization that was 
created by the New York State Legislature in 1948 to provide shared educational 
programs and services to school districts. Qualifying programs are processed 
through Dutchess County and the district receives 40-50% of monies spent during a 
school year back the next year.  For example, if the district pays $16,000 for the 
Calico Ball one year, the district receives around $8,000 back the next.  

It had taken a lot of work, and a donation of $2500 for the initial ½ year administration 
fee, to get the district to sign up with the BOCES Co-Ser but everyone agreed that it 
was a sound approach to making every dollar spent toward arts in education 
programming go farther.  This seems especially poignant today when the BCSD was 
just rated ineffective in arts integration.

Even with the success of a renewed relationship with BOCES, BAEF felt that the 
BCSD was not getting as many contracts through the Co-Ser as was possible; that 
there was programming happening in the district that qualified for the Co-Ser, but it 
was not being put through.

That is why last October I approached the superintendent with a proposal that BAEF 
offer a $5000 donation to be used as a stipend for a teacher in the BCSD be the arts in 
education coordinator.  This person’s responsibilities would include:

     1. Educating principals, teachers and PTA members about the Dutchess County 
     BOCES Co-Ser and how to take advantage of it. 

     2. Helping teachers to understand what existing programming qualifies for the 
     BOCES Co-Ser aid and helping teachers to fill out and submit contracts to the 
     BOCES Co-Ser coordinator.

     3. Understanding the New York State curriculum and pointing teachers to new 
     programming that complements the curriculum and qualifies for the Co-Ser 
     program.

     4. Keeping track of what contracts were submitted and letting principals know that 
     they had earned a credit of funds that they could use the next year.

BAEF offered this after paying an arts in education coordinator outside of the district for 
a year.  While this person was qualified for the position and was able to make some 
progress toward the goals stated above, BAEF felt that the position would be more 
effective from within the district.  

After hearing the proposal, the superintendent thanked me and told me that she agreed; 
the position would be much more effective if it was held by someone within the district.  
She told me that she had been thinking the same thing and she explained the idea behind 
the TOSA position.  This was the first I had heard of it but, from what she told me, it 
seemed like a very good use of the position.  The superintendent told me that the district 
would be appointing a TOSA that would have, among other responsibilities, Arts in 
Education Coordinator for the district.  I left elated.

A couple of weeks later I was contacted by the new Arts in Education Coordinator, who 
enthusiastically told me she was excited to take on the role. Aside from an email where 
the Arts in Education Coordinator acknowledged her new position to the Assistant 
Superintendent for Business and another to all of the teachers in the 
district, I am not sure what she was able to accomplish. I had recommended that she meet with Maria DeWald, the BOCES coordinator to discuss opportunities for our district.  
This did not happen.  I asked her to coordinate with the music teachers to put the 
NYSSMA and DCMA fees through the Co-Ser. This also did not happen.  I made contact 
with the Arts in Education Coordinator from the Arlington District to ask if it would be 
ok for our Arts in Education Coordinator to contact her for advice but I don’t think this 
happened either. I thought being in touch with the Arlington District could be really 
beneficial since they put over $250,000 worth of contracts through the Co-Ser each year.  
The BCSD put fewer contracts through the Co-Ser this year than for the 2012-13 or  
2013-14 school year. In 2012-13, the BCSD had 6 contracts totaling $16,237.  In 2013-
14, the BCSD had 5 contracts totaling $15,141.50.  This year, we had 3 contracts totaling 
$13,230.

When I met on August 11, 2015 with the Arts in Education Coordinator, the assistant 
superintendent and, unexpectedly, the superintendent to go over how the 2014-15 year 
went with for the Arts in Education coordinator position, I was told by the superintendent 
that the person who I was told would be the arts in education coordinator was not actually 
the arts in education coordinator in any official capacity; that any work she did in this 
area was purely volunteer.  She said that the arts in education coordinator position did not 
actually fit under the TOSA umbrella.

This leaves me with several questions and concerns:

     1. This was not how it was presented to me in the October 2015.  Did I misunderstand?          Did the superintendent misunderstand the TOSA regulations and when she figured it            out, did she officially change the arts in education coordinator position?  Were there            other responsibilities added to her position instead of the arts in education coordinator?      What were this person’s total responsibilities as TOSA?  Who did she report to? How            was her effectiveness measured?

     2. BAEF had offered funds to help support this position.  The offer was refused and 
     the job was not performed.  Why, when the superintendent decided that the arts in 
     education coordinator would not be a paid position didn’t she approach BAEF to 
     revisit the idea of BAEF helping to fund the position.

     3. The district pays $5000/year to participate in the Co-Ser.  Are we getting the 
     maximum benefits we can from this program?  As I mentioned earlier, for several 
     years, I have asked administrators to help me coordinate with the music teachers 
     to put the NYSSMA fees through the Co-Ser.  When I asked the arts in education 
     coordinator about this at our recent meeting, she said that this had not happened 
     because the music teachers were paying these fees out of their own pockets.  Is 
     this true?  Why is this happening?

This all seems very important to take a much closer look at given the August 10, 2015 
school board meeting where several board members were prepared to vote to instate four TOSA positions even after the superintendent was not able to give a clear explanation of the roles these TOSA’s would fill.  This represents, as far as I am able to understand it, 4 
salaries, so more than $300,000.  I hope the board will take the information I present here 
and make sure that they understand what they are voting for when they vote for these 
TOSA positions.  I can’t say whether I am for or against them with the information I have 
been able to glean.  Perhaps the board members know more than the public on this?  Is 
their job description confidential?  I hope the board is doing their due diligence of 
research and asking plenty of questions before voting for this or any of agenda items that 
require their approval.

Sincerely,

Meredith Heuer

chair, Beacon Arts & Education Foundation

Kelly Ellenwood

vice-president, Beacon Arts
0 Comments

Two Haldane Teachers Shift Into Different Gears

9/26/2015

0 Comments

 
This article from Philipstown.info explains exactly what the TOSAs (Teachers On Special Assignment) at Haldane in Cold Spring are responsible for doing.  Totally concrete, clear and simple.  The Beacon Administration supplied a TOSA booklet in response to questions about Beacon's TOSAs.  See below for both:
Two Haldane Teachers Shift Into Different Gears 
​
September 26, 2015
Simon Dudar and Leah Horn move into new positions
By Alison Rooney

The following is an update regarding our own TOSA positions, with a parent's letter and the Superintendent's responses:

Is their workday the same length as the other teachers? Yes, they meet the same contractual agreements, they are members of the BTA and are required to follow the same BTA contract.

How do they decide which teachers to be in touch with i.e. do they communicate with a teacher only when a teacher requests it or are they getting in touch with teachers of their own accord? Either way, some teachers are brand new and ISTs need to introduce themselves as they would with any colleague. The teachers may contact any IST and the IST will link them with the person who can best assist them. Some teachers are texting ISTs, some people come to their office, some people speak to them face to face.... they could use the phone, they could leave a message in their mailbox or send a note through the inner-office mail, they could send an e-mail or use some other form of media.

What role does the principal of each school have with this work? Are the principals notified that an IST is in their building and working with a specific teacher? Does a principal get updates to monitor progress on the teacher in the area that the IST is working with the teacher? The Principal should play a role of a supporter.... the ISTs are people who can help our students who are still developing. The ISTs are just one part of a larger Instructional Support System of which the Principals and others manage. Although Principals do not assign teachers to ISTs they can recommend that a teacher contact the ISTs. An IST signs into the building in the exact same way any other teacher signs in. The work between the IST and the teacher is confidential unless the teacher receiving the support chooses to discuss with their principal.

If they are waiting on requests, is there any data so far on how much teachers are making use of the IST’s? We will report on the ISTs in the future.

Since the list of responsibilities on the brochure was quite lengthy, does each IST have a particular role/goal or do they all cover the same responsibilities? How does the teacher know who to contact for their particular area of concern? There are core strategies and skills that each possess and areas of assignment. All are learning items such as teaching strategies, root cause analysis, strengths-based problem solving process, vocabulary strategies. They may contact any IST and the IST will link them with the person who can best assist them.

If they have different responsibilities, I would like to know who does what. This list is not all inclusive but will give you an idea. 1. CSE, CPSE, in-classroom supports for students w/disabilities Kate 2. Grad Point students, literacy across the curriculum Alice 3. New teachers, training and assistance in implementation of 3012-d and 3012-c, SLOs - Kim 4. Working with the Bridge students, training and assistance in the implementation of Part 154 Regulation - Fabiola.

How is the IST consultation different from that of the mentors that were just appointed? The mentors do not have the information these people have. The IST have received and are receiving training in interventions that our teachers do not have. That's the whole point Meredith, if everyone had these skills we would not need ISTs. The ISTs received intensive training, Mentors (ie: other teachers) do not have the same level of information on the state requirements and regulations, they have not been trained in processes used by the ISTs including curriculum-based assessment, root cause analysis and a strengths-based problem solving process. They have not spent days in training and practice in specific, discrete skills.

Dr. Walkley has said that the IST’s are writing curriculum for the AIS. How has the curriculum changed? How are the IST’s interacting with the AIS staff and how has this impacted instructional practices with students that are classified? The ISTs are assisting teachers in these programs. Some AIS teachers have not had an articulated or aligned curriculum. The curriculum has not been consistent across all classes. The ISTs have provided skill based curriculums for the teachers for their review. It is not the ISTs role to ensure a curriculum changes or is implemented. That is the role of the principal. All of the ISTs are members or resources to the AIS Secondary Visioning Team. AIS programs are generally for general education students.

If a particular student is being discussed or is working with an IST individually, are parents informed of this? Does the parent also meet with the IST? Depends, some work is done in the classroom teacher present and might be a co-teach situation. There would be a different approach at the elementary level, right now we are focusing to secondary and the work is more with teachers right now.

In all of Dr. Walkley’s descriptions about what the IST’s do, she consistently spoke of them being an intermediate stop for students who are struggling in the classroom in order to attempt to avoid classification. Dr. Walkley never mentioned that an IST would be involved with teacher evaluations but listed on the TOSA brochure is “understanding the 3012d regulations”. How does this fit in with the rest of the IST responsibility? It seems like it’s very different skill set and perhaps not even the responsibility of a teacher, but more a union issue? First and foremost there is mis-information here. The purpose of instructional support is to NOT to avoid classification. The purpose is to ensure appropriate referrals and to increase the efficiency rate of classification. It is not an intermediate stop but an opportunity to receive support when a student first falls behind. Another misunderstanding here is that the ISTs are NOT involved in teacher evaluations. That is false and is not allowed by the state, only under certain conditions could a teacher be part of the evaluation process. Beacon has NOT chosen to take that route. It is required by the State in the law that the district providesawareness training about 3012-d and the transfer from 3012-c to 3012-d. ISTs are also staff developers, they can provide training in many areas, topics, skills, processes, etc. I do not know the expectations of the Unions nor would I discuss the business of the Union but I do know the expectations of the State for all districts... Why would that be a conflict of interest? ISTs are members of the Union.
​
I am not, in principal, against the IST. My concern is that 4 ISTs adds up to a lot of salary and perhaps some of this money could be used more efficiently another way. Are you in favor of helping developing students? Are you in favor of raising achievement across the district? There is no evidence in the last 10 years that other interventions have been successful in increasing student achievement across larger numbers of students. One on one, or classes, yes, but not across grade levels or content areas. Since you have not reviewed any data at this point, what evidence do you have that money is not being used efficiently? You are premature in your judgment this early in the year and in the roll-out.

Beacon TOSA Booklet
Picture
Picture
0 Comments

    Subscribe to our mailing list

    * indicates required

    Subscribe

    Archives

    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    September 2014
    August 2014

    Categories

    All
    Advocates For Beacon Schools
    APPR
    BAEF /Beacon Arts And Education Foundation
    BCSD
    Board Of Education
    BTA
    Health & Wellness
    IST (Instructional Support Teacher)
    NAACP
    State Assessment Data
    Superintendent
    Teachers
    TOSA (Teachers On Special Assignment)
    VAM (Value Added Model)

    RSS Feed

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • About Us
  • USEFUL INFO
  • Events
  • News
  • What Can I Do
  • Contact